If you're bored, read through the comments on Math Unveils the Truth - Torah is of Divine Origin, but now it's a drinking game!
Take two drinks every time they repeat somethng dogmatically
Take a drink every time they misrepresent the video because they didn't watch it
Take two drinks every time they mention Bible Codes
Take a drink every time they say that Evron is doing it for the money
Take a drink every time they show childlike snark
Take two drinks every time they use a fallacy listed on YourLogicalFallacyIs
Take three drinks every time they bring up ancient scientists/aliens/nasa propaganda
Take two drinks every time they mispell a thrid grede word
Take three drinks every time they use an argument from incredulity
I am not responsible for alcohol poisoning.
Take two drinks every time they mention slavery
Take two drinks every time they mention genocide, take an extra drink if it's about the poor, innocent, guiltless, blameless, pure Amalekites
Take four drinks every time they menion the GRAND CANYON[1], 1
Take four drinks every time they say that the Torah only prohibits the murder of Jews[2], 2
Take two drinks every time they presuppose regular laws of nature during the flood
Take two drinks every time they mention the Moon/Sun supposedly being created after the plants
Take three drinks every time they use a mistranslation as a basis for "criticism"
Take a sip every time they say apologetics disprove the Torah
Take two drinks every time they arbitrarily deem something incompitent design
Take a drink every time they mention a supposedly immoral law that the Oral Torah reconciles
Take a drink every time they mention supposed scientific/historical innacuracies in the Torah
1: """"""Jill Nye the Lying Guy""""" says that the Grand Canyon, which has remained untouched by the miraculous flood, disproves the miraculous flood? The argument: "P1: the global flood should have interacted with the Grand Canyon. P2: the Grand Canyon is untouched by a global flood. C: the global flood did not happen." Let's see what happens if we remove the unrequired (there surely was a reason for the flood miraculously not modifying the geological records) premise 1: "P: the Grand Canyon is untouched by a global flood. C: the global flood did not happen." Oh, that doesn't make sense, does it...
2: (Timestamp: 2:30) "'Thou shalt not kill' means only in your tribe. I mean there's no hint at all [except for the lack of specifying in-tribe murder] that it means humanity in general; that there's no sense of shared humanity [oh, is there?], it's all tribal." Penn Jilette, one of the guys behind Penn & Teller: Bullshit! has now resorted to bull$#!+ himself. Fallacies used: PIDOOMA (as he seems to have just made up the idea he's pushing; no reputable source makes any reference to it) argument from ignorance (as he shifts the burden of proof by implicitly asserting that it must be disproven that the Torah is referring to in-tribe murder, instead of proving his assertion), and Argument by assertion (as no evidence is given for this assertion).