Dissecting An Evil Idea (About "Anti-Vaxxers")

September 29, 2022

It was at the end of my last class at school, and someone, a friend of mine in that class, mentioned (randomly) that polio is (supposedly) "back." The teacher said that it's because people aren't getting injected for it as much anymore. The friend then said something like, "and that's why anti-vaxxers shouldn't be allowed to have children." I don't know if that was supposed to be partially a joke or something, but, wow! The level of evil a common, ordinary person can support! He then suggested that the children of those who don't desire for their children to be injected with certain injections should have the children forcibly kidnapped from them by the band of thugs called government, and given to a different set of strangers ("foster parents") (What if they support ALL BUT ONE numerous injections? Should their kids still be kidnapped?).
Why does this guy's medical advice have to be enforced to all parents in the United States? I don't know. "Safety" (more like tyranny), I suppose. But, yes, think about that: this ordinary person believes (presumably; maybe it was an exaggeration [joke], but I'll assume it was mostly honest) that children should be kidnapped from their parents because the parents don't support a certain medical treatment, a preemptive medical treatment for a disease virtually no-one contracts. Should parents also be required, their kids at the threat of being kidnapped for good, to strap their kids to pillows and have them constantly wear helmets because they MAY fall and MAY die from falling on their head or something? No! But that's all vaccines are, just preemptive treatment that is supposed (they actually have 0% benefit and have never prevented any disease, ever, because viruses don't cause disease) to prevent diseases that someone MAY "catch."
The idea that man has to micromanage every single family and their medical choices -- by force (so much for "just wanting to help"!) -- because of some rare diseases that (supposedly, according to the [obso-]elites' narrative) have been around since time immemorial -- that's idolatry. Only the Almighty controls who gets sick, who dies, who lives, who is healed from ailments (which he decrees the start of as well), and man is supposed to seek natural (as in, not supernatural or miraculous) treatments for diseases, but only within reason. I don't think giving children 50 harmful injections when they're still toddlers is exactly "within reason." These injections that have only been invented within the past 200 years (to be generous), so, something man has lived without for the vast majority of history.
Anyway, according to that friend, if I'm understanding what he said properly, if I have a son, and I don't take him to the doctor to get injected with one injection when HE'S PERFECTLY FINE AND NOT SICK IN THE SLIGHTEST, and pretty much no-one today is getting polio, I should be a criminal and my son should be "removed" from me forcibly forever. Makes perfect sense, right?
So, I was right there when he said it, and I'm a so-called "anti-vaxxer" (so he believes me to be pretty much a potential dangerous criminal who shouldn't be allowed to have children), but I gotta remember to not argue back against idiocy. What use is it to argue with the brainwashed who has no desire to seek the truth? May as well shout into the air at the top of a mountain, or piss in the wind (which is more worthwhile since urinating actually is useful and important).
May God's enemies (yes, that includes the vaccine-'n'-injection-propagandists and all that -- and that guy is only a victim of them, not one of them) melt away and may their corpes decay and burn forever, very soon!